Connect with us

2017 F1

F1 on wrong path with 2017 rules shakeup – Designer



F1 designer worried about 2017 rules shakeup

F1 designer worried about 2017 rules shakeup

A well-known F1 engineer is concerned the sport is setting off down the wrong path with its radical new rules for 2017.

On social media, Carlos Sainz posted a photo demonstrating that he has drastically bulked up muscle in preparation for the much faster cars set to race this year.

But Luca Furbatto – a former designer for McLaren, Toro Rosso and most recently Manor – is concerned that the 2017 rules might not actually be good for the show.

Firstly, he is worried that the top teams will pull away from the rest of the field.

“In particular,” he told Italian journalist Leo Turrini’s blog, “Mercedes and Red Bull always build a better chassis than rivals with more modest resources.”

And he thinks the new, bigger and wider Pirelli tyres, while increasing mechanical grip, will also favour the teams with the better aerodynamic resources.

“For the cars that generate higher downforce, their grip will be even higher, which will also affect the difference between teams even though everyone hoped that it would be the other way around,” he said.

As for the ‘power units’, Furbatto worries that the importance of the complex technology will continue to dominate in 2017 even though the emphasis appears to be shifting to aero.

“I don’t think we will see a change for the better,” said the Italian.

“Actually, I think it’s the opposite. A 2017 car will spend a higher percentage of the lap at full throttle, so the benefit for the teams with the most power will only increase.”

He said the extra power could also mean drivers have to conserve more fuel, while many commentators are concerned that faster cars and shorter braking zones could make overtaking harder.

“I don’t want to criticise the new regulations,” said Furbatto, “but I look at objective data and the results of calculations.

“As for entertainment, in my opinion this is not directly related to speed. At Mugello for example, a MotoGP is 25 seconds slower than a F1 car, but I cannot say that a MotoGP race is less spectacular.”

He said a better route for F1 might have been to follow the Le Mans direction, where designers have more freedom to design fundamentally different cars than their rivals.

So when predicting the likely pecking order in 2017, Furbatto said: “I expect victories to be disputed between Mercedes and Red Bull.

“Red Bull have always made an excellent chassis under the leadership of Adrian Newey, while the Mercedes car as a whole is very balanced with the best engine in the series.

“But I fully admit that we could see some surprises that could shake things up.”

As for Ferrari, Furbatto concluded: “I will refrain from making forecasts, but I do believe we will see some results from last year’s reshuffle in the leadership team.”


Continue Reading
  • Kash

    Bang on. The ‘pulling out of F1’ threat by RedBull in 2015 seemed to have worked for them indirectly. Shame F1 is at the mercy of the top 3 teams.

  • Richard Piers

    You are totally correct. the cars will look little different, the speed only visible on a stopwatch. It may be a bit more demanding physically of the drivers that is all. Overtaking will be prejudiced by the additional aero.
    Just more fiddling and additional cost. Stupid !


    Based on what you’re saying what makes sense is that two or three teams will be fighting at the front. The midfield will be battling each other and honestly i don’t real pay attention to the very back of the field unless someone is slicing their way to the front. To me with the greater speeds the passing will become more exciting and ballsy and you forgot one variable, the drivers and who really is the bravest and most skilled.I believe with the higher down force and later braking, passing can be done in unexpected places with a genius driver. So let’s give it a chance with 5-6 races because this is all theories.

  • Lovejoint

    We know this. We understand this. But we also understand that the sole purpose of 2017 rules was to help RBR, not to improve the show, or reshuffle the pecking order. Well, reshuffle yes, but only if it puts RBR on top.

Most Popular is not affiliated with Formula 1, Formula One Management, Formula One Administration, Formula One Licensing BV, Formula One World Championship Ltd or any other organization or entity associated with the official Formula One governing organizations or their shareholders. Copyrighted material used under Fair Use/Fair Comment. All Rights Reserved © 2017 Prime Sport Media