Uncategorized

Q&A with Williams F1’s Mark Gillan

Q: Due to a couple of accidents and a grid penalty for Pastor, we never got to see the true pace of the Williams-Renault FW34 in Montreal. What was the car capable of around the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve?
Mark Gillan: We had decent high fuel long-run pace on Friday and Pastor was pretty quick in Saturday’s morning session on lower fuel too, so we were reasonably confident going into qualifying. Both drivers had accidents that damaged their gearboxes and as Pastor’s was his race box in qualifying he took a five place grid penalty going into the race. Both drivers pushed hard on their one-stop strategies, but we were ultimately not as competitive as we have been recently, which made progress through the pack not as easy as we would have hoped for. Nevertheless, we will spend a great deal of effort dissecting the data from the weekend, especially the effect that the large changes in track temperature and track evolution had on the tyre performance, and how best in future to react accordingly.

Q: How did the performance upgrades that you took to the race perform?
MG: The Montreal aero upgrades performed as we had expected and were run on both cars.

Q: How much was Bruno’s weekend compromised by his accident during Friday practice?
MG: Both of Bruno’s Friday sessions had issues, with the first session being compromised by not being able to use his DRS system and in the second session he had an accident which damaged three corners on the car, the front and rear wings and the gearbox. The mechanics worked very hard on Friday evening to rebuild the car and we had enough spares to ensure that his car remained to the latest specification and was ready for the beginning of the Saturday morning session.

Q: It was a tight call between one and two pitstops during the race. In hindsight, which was the best strategy?
MG: Given our start positions we were happy with the one-stop strategy but need to look at how we managed the tyres during the stints to see if we could have been quicker.

Q: Montreal is notoriously hard on brakes. Did you have any brake wear issues on either car?
MG: Montreal is very tough on brakes but our brake material and cooling solutions worked well, so the brakes were not a major issue during the race.

Q: The European Grand Prix comes next. What are the main challenges of the Valencia street circuit?
MG: In a similar manner to Montreal the Valencia circuit layout places a lot of stress on the braking system. Also with the potential for high ambient temperatures the car’s cooling system is given a stern test.

Source: Williams


All material and photos are copyrighted material and owned by their respective owners. Use or depiction of images or trademarks throughout this website is for illustrative and editorial purposes only.Images come courtesy of; ferrari.com, mclaren.com, Sahara forceindiaf1.com, redbull.com, mercedesgp.com, Caterham F1, toyota, Sauber, williamsf1, lotus, Marussia, HRT, getty Images,LAT, Reuters Pictures and AP Photos.


http://www.formula1onlive.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Facebook Comments
Loading...
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ThisisF1.com is not affiliated with Formula 1, Formula One Management, Formula One Administration, Formula One Licensing BV or any other subsidiary associated with the official Formula One governing organizations The website is an unofficial website, all names and logos used here are property of their respective owners, more specially FORMULA 1, FORMULA ONE, F1, GRAND PRIX and logos and the wide Curves logo are trademarks of Formula One Licensing BV, a Formula One Group Company. Use or depiction of images or trademarks throughout this website is for illustrative and editorial purposes only. Official Formula One information can be found at www.formula1.com

Copyright © 2015 Thisisf1.com

To Top