The F1 teams thinking to introduce Double DRS it’s a similar system of Mercedes GP. Recently FIA approved the Mercedes GP’s DDRS, now the team consider introduce this system.
The Double DRS gives more qualifying speed and Mercedes GP proved DDRS performance with Rosberg victory at Chinese Grand Prix.
Mercedes GP’s innovative device progress top speed by stalling the front wing when the DRS is activated, given that a specific gain in qualifying when DRS use is unrestricted.
Lotus complaint the DDRS, which works by channelling, air from bay in the rear wing endplates to the car’s front wing, but had its argument discarded by the FIA at the Chinese GP.
The Vodafone McLaren Mercedes team technical director Paddy Lowe said one main consideration is that the DDRS has limited use in the race.
“In these days of really very limited capacity – whether that’s people or time in wind tunnels – to develop aerodynamics, you do have to carefully select where you put your effort to make the most profit in performance, so this will fall into that camp,” Lowe said.
“We have to decide how much we can get from it, how it ranks compared to other areas we may work on. It does have the immediate downside that it really is only a qualifying benefit as far as we can see, so immediately it has to earn quite a lot to make that worthwhile.”
Ferrari now considers develops the innovative DDRS for F2012 and they are currently has several problems to solve with 2012 car.
“We’ve been looking at it for a while,” he said. “I think it’s just a case of weighing up what the performance is on our car. It’s bound to vary differently from car to car and particularly if you’ve had that system in mind and developed your car to work around it, you’re further up the development curve.
“It’s not just a case of applying it to our current aerodynamic characteristic, it’s then trying to exploit it further after that, so I expect there will be a two-fold thing: we will know instantly – or we know instantly – what it’s worth in terms of lap time and we can weigh that up in the cost performance and the effort needed. And then we also need to look at what’s the ultimate potential of that device. We’ve been looking at it for a month or two. Now it’s clear we can at least start working for sure, weighing up everything properly.”
Lotus technical director James Allison led the failed protest, but after the FIA ruling he admitted the rest of the paddock would have to consider introducing a similar system.
“Well they’ll certainly need to decide whether or not the opportunity-cost of doing that system is higher than developing the things they had in mind otherwise. And that’s exactly the same choice we’ll face in our team.”
Sauber has made a powerful start to the season, is not likely to throw its resources at the system.
“We’re looking into the system to try and assess it fully, to work out the lap time, or qualifying lap time gain, versus costs,” chief designer Matt Morris said. “I think at the moment for us it doesn’t balance out. We’re probably better off spending our money on more conventional lap time.”
All material and photos are copyrighted material and owned by their respective owners. Use or depiction of images or trademarks throughout this website is for illustrative and editorial purposes only.Images come courtesy of; ferrari.com, mclaren.com, Sahara forceindiaf1.com, redbull.com, mercedesgp.com, Caterham F1, toyota, Sauber, williamsf1, lotus, Marussia, HRT, Daylife.com, getty Images/LAT and AP Photos.